Uitvoering van de studie

Aanvullende vragenlijst

Wijzigingsdatum: 09-04-2024

In deze paragraaf:

De aanvullende lijst van de eerste meting van NEMESIS-3 is zo opgebouwd dat een vergelijking mogelijk is met de belangrijkste vragen en schalen die gebruikt zijn in NEMESIS-2.​1​ De onderwerpen die in de aanvullende vragenlijst van de eerste meting aan bod kwamen, zijn:

​2​ ​3​ ​4​ ​5​ ​6​ ​7​ ​8​ ​9​ ​10​ ​11​ ​12​ ​13​ ​14​ ​15​ ​16​ ​17​ ​18​

Referenties

  1. 1.
    Ten Have M, Tuithof M, van Dorsselaer S, Schouten F, de Graaf R. The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-3 (NEMESIS-3): Objectives, methods and baseline characteristics of the sample. Vol. 32, International journal of methods in psychiatric research. 2023. p. e1942.
  2. 2.
    Honings S, Drukker M, ten Have M, de Graaf R, van Dorsselaer S, van Os J. Psychotic Experiences and Risk of Violence Perpetration and Arrest in the General Population: A Prospective Study [Internet]. Mechelli A, editor. Vol. 11, PLOS ONE. 2016. p. e0159023. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159023
  3. 3.
    van Nierop M, van Os J, Gunther N, Myin-Germeys I, de Graaf R, ten Have M, et al. Phenotypically Continuous With Clinical Psychosis, Discontinuous in Need for Care: Evidence for an Extended Psychosis Phenotype [Internet]. Vol. 38, Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2012. p. 231–238. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/schbul/sbr129
  4. 4.
    Allison C, Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S. Toward Brief “Red Flags” for Autism Screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist in 1,000 Cases and 3,000 Controls [Internet]. Vol. 51, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2012. p. 202–212.e7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0890856711010331
  5. 5.
    Levine DW, Lewis MA, Bowen DJ, Kripke DF, Kaplan RM, Naughton MJ, et al. Reliability and validity of Women’s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale. [Internet]. Vol. 15, Psychological Assessment. 2003. p. 137–148. Available from: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.137
  6. 6.
    ten Have M, Penninx BWJH, van Dorsselaer S, Tuithof M, Kleinjan M, de Graaf R. Insomnia among current and remitted common mental disorders and the association with role functioning: results from a general population study [Internet]. Vol. 25, Sleep Medicine. 2016. p. 34–41. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389945716301319
  7. 7.
    de Graaf R, ten Have M, van Dorsselaer S. The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2): design and methods [Internet]. Vol. 19, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2010. p. 125–141. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.317
  8. 8.
    Baker M, Stabile M, Deri C. What Do Self-Reported, Objective, Measures of Health Measure? [Internet]. Vol. XXXIX, Journal of Human Resources. 2004. p. 1067–1093. Available from: http://jhr.uwpress.org/lookup/doi/10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.4.1067
  9. 9.
    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Vol. 35, Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2003. p. 1381–1395.
  10. 10.
    de Jong-Gierveld J, Kamphuls F. The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale [Internet]. Vol. 9, Applied Psychological Measurement. 1985. p. 289–299. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014662168500900307
  11. 11.
    Van Tilburg TG, de Jong Gierveld J. Reference standards for the loneliness scale. Vol. 30, Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie. 1999. p. 158–163.
  12. 12.
    Brugha T, Bebbington P, Tennant C, Hurry J. The List of Threatening Experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat [Internet]. Vol. 15, Psychological Medicine. 1985. p. 189–194. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S003329170002105X/type/journal_article
  13. 13.
    Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. The MOS Short-form General Health Survey [Internet]. Vol. 26, Medical Care. 1988. p. 724–735. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00005650-198807000-00007
  14. 14.
    Von Korff M, Crane PK, Alonso J, Vilagut G, Angermeyer MC, Bruffaerts R, et al. Modified WHODAS-II provides valid measure of global disability but filter items increased skewness [Internet]. Vol. 61, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2008. p. 1132–1143. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0895435608000061
  15. 15.
    Schaufeli WB. Maslach burnout inventory-general survey (MBI-GS). Maslach burnout inventory manual. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
  16. 16.
    Schaufeli, W.B., van Dierendonck, D. Utrechtse burn-out schaal: handleiding, Pearson Assessment and Information B.V, Amsterdam. 2000.
  17. 17.
    Williams J, Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Norton S, Pesola F, et al. Development and evaluation of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery [Internet]. Vol. 50, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2015. p. 777–786. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00127-014-0983-0
  18. 18.
    Bockting W, Benner A, Coleman E. Gay and Bisexual Identity Development Among Female-to-Male Transsexuals in North America: Emergence of a Transgender Sexuality [Internet]. Vol. 38, Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2009. p. 688–701. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-009-9489-3

Aanvullende informatie

Hoe te verwijzen

    ten Have, M., Tuithof, M., van Dorsselaer, S., Schouten, F., de Graaf, R. Uitvoering van de studie NEMESISAanvullende vragenlijst .Geraadpleegd op: 15 november 2024.Trimbos-instituut, Utrecht

Accessibility by WAH